Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-22 18:23:41

Le 22/10/12 22:20, Daniel James a écrit :
> On 22 October 2012 20:54, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I disagree. Using BOOST_TEST_ as prefix even if longer make the code
>> clearest. This is one of the Boost rules and any Boost library should follow
>> them.
> It isn't, the rule is:
>> Macro (gasp!) names all uppercase and begin with BOOST_.
> That's from
You are right, but how we can ensure that two independent Boost
libraries don't deliver the same macro?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at