Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-23 17:36:55

Alexander Lamaison <awl03 <at> doc.ic.ac.uk> writes:

> Out of the three, my favourite is '+'.  '-' looks like you're removing
> something and '***' looks like a comment at first glance.

Let's see if anyone else express preference in this regard.
 
> Another character that would be idea is '@' which Python and Java use
> but, if your implementation is based on operators, I guess that one
> isn't possible.

Yep. I'd like that as well.

Gennadiy