Re: [boost] [thread] terminating destructor

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] terminating destructor
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-26 12:06:48

Le 26/10/12 09:53, Andrzej Krzemienski a écrit :
> 2012/10/25 Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>
>
>> I've been working a little bit these classes and I have not find that
>> interrupt-and-join on the destructor could be a a good compromise. As
>> others, maybe you, have signaled, each developer could need a specific
>> action on the destruction. As always been more generic means making the
>> class parameterized with a policy.
>>
>>
>> Does this respond to your question?
>
> It definitely does!
> Just one suggestion, wouldn't it be better if the policy was only required
> to be callable with the argument of type thread& ? I.g.:
>
>    struct strict_thread_joiner
>    {
>      void operator()( thread& t ) const
>      {
>        if (t.joinable()) {
>          t.join();
>        }
>      }
>    };
>
>
Yeah, this would be much more simple.

I will need that the policy is stateless to avoid the moving issues for 
thread_joiner.

Best,
Vicente