Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Gennadiy Rozenal (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-04 04:19:48
Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
> I don't think that there should be conflicts but I wanted just to report
> that boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp defines
> #define BOOST_TEST(expr) ((expr)? (void)0:
No one is expected to include both Boost.Test and other unit testing variants in
the test file.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk