Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?

Subject: Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?
From: TONGARI (tongari95_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-07 00:18:02

2012/11/7 Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]>

> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:14 AM, TONGARI <tongari95_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > 2012/11/6 Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > Wouldn't this fit in Boost.TypeTraits, along side the other type traits
> > > that introspect operators?
> > >
> >
> > TypeTraits is also in my consideration, so I'm not against it.
> > So would you suggest opening up a new Functional category in that?
> >
>
> Hmmm, well, maybe for documentation purposes, but I think that's the only
> place that Boost.TypeTraits has a notion of category...? I would think it
> might be sufficient to group it with the operator type traits in the
> documentation, though.
>

Well, though conceptually reasonable, but that'd seem exotic in all of the
others named has_xxx...

I still prefer a new place if possible that I could have more control on it.