Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-07 01:57:18

Le 07/11/12 06:18, TONGARI a écrit :
> 2012/11/7 Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:14 AM, TONGARI <tongari95_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> 2012/11/6 Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]>
>>>> Wouldn't this fit in Boost.TypeTraits, along side the other type traits
>>>> that introspect operators?
>>> TypeTraits is also in my consideration, so I'm not against it.
>>> So would you suggest opening up a new Functional category in that?
>> Hmmm, well, maybe for documentation purposes, but I think that's the only
>> place that Boost.TypeTraits has a notion of category...? I would think it
>> might be sufficient to group it with the operator type traits in the
>> documentation, though.
> Well, though conceptually reasonable, but that'd seem exotic in all of the
> others named has_xxx...

Boost.TypeTraits has other traits as is_, ... What about is_callable_with?
> I still prefer a new place if possible that I could have more control on it.
What kind of control do you want?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at