Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Process 0.5: Another update/potential candidate for an official library
From: Yakov Galka (ybungalobill_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-15 13:23:45
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Alexander Lamaison <awl03_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Every C++ runtime implementation, every C++ standard library
Likely to be true at this point in time (although non of us can check
*every* C++ runtime), but I know plans to do otherwise.
> and other Boost libraries on Windows
AFAIK not boost.locale.
[...] it is at least consistent.
So does using UTF-8 everywhere.
> The confusion arives from
> unilaterally changing one library to interpret 8-bit strings
This is not unilaterally. There are (non boost) libraries that do this.
Also there will not be confusion if, as I said, it is done as a
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk