Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for November 2012

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for November 2012
From: Ronald Garcia (rxg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-15 19:53:58

Hello Francisco,

Thank you for your note.  Could you forward me a copy of the October 3 note, because I do not have a copy.
Also, I cannot estimate the time when the review will happen.  You will need to find a review manager first and then schedule the review, so the time until the review could vary greatly.  Ultimately it is up to you whether you would like to continue working or prepare for review now.

Best,
Ron

On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Francisco José Tapia wrote:

> Hi Ronald
> 
> The 3 of October I sent a message requesting the Formal Review of the
> library Countertree. I don't know if this is sufficient for to request a
> Formal Review. If not, please, say me, in order to to do it.
> 
> That message contains a brief description of the project. The code and the
> documentation are located in my dropbox, because when I had lost the
> password of the vault. But if it is necessary I will put there.
> 
> Project location ( zip file with code and documentation) :
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/8437476/works/countertree_code_doc.zip
> 
> Online documentation with code download :
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/8437476/works/countertree/index.html
> 
> I would know if you have any time estimation about the beginning of the
> review. I ask you because, in the Countertree library the logical expansion
> is the concurrent version. This is important because many libraries like
> the Threading Building Blocks have concurrent data structures, but don't
> have concurrent data structures based on trees ( set, multiset, map and
> multimap), due to the difficulty of to distribute the elements stored
> between an arbitrary number of threads. With the countertree is easy
> because you can use like a vector.
> 
> Depending of the time estimation, if close, I will do more quietly and I
> can be a reviewer of some library, if not I will tray to finish the
> concurrent part for the review.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Francisco Tapia
> 
> 
> 2012/11/12 Ronald Garcia <rxg_at_[hidden]>
> 
>> Thank you for catching that Chris.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Ron
>> 
>> On Nov 11, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Christopher Kormanyos wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> <snip>
>>> 
>>>> The following libraries have been accepted to Boost, but have not yet
>>> 
>>>> been submitted to SVN:
>>> 
>>> <snip>
>>> 
>>> There's Multiprecision as well, unless I missed it in the list.
>>> 
>>> Thank you for the excellent update!
>>> 
>>> Best regards, Chris.
>>> 
>>> <snip>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost