Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] Proposal: a sub-maintainer of Boost.Range
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-27 06:18:27
On 27-11-2012 12:04, Michel Morin wrote:
> Considering this situation, I'd like to make a proposal about
> ** Adding a sub-maintainer to Boost.Range **
> This reduces author's maintenance burden and also helps
> more stable development of the library.
I would like to see a more liberal policy towards maintenance. For
example, there are many people that are knowledgable and responciple,
and which can easily apply patches that have been agreed on. Therefore I
see a "sub-maintainer" role as too narrow; why should he not be able to
patch a different library as long as the ticket has been discussed and
the solution approved by the official maintainers?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk