|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] Proposal: a sub-maintainer of Boost.Range
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-27 06:18:27
On 27-11-2012 12:04, Michel Morin wrote:
> Considering this situation, I'd like to make a proposal about
> Boost.Range:
>
> ** Adding a sub-maintainer to Boost.Range **
>
> This reduces author's maintenance burden and also helps
> more stable development of the library.
I would like to see a more liberal policy towards maintenance. For
example, there are many people that are knowledgable and responciple,
and which can easily apply patches that have been agreed on. Therefore I
see a "sub-maintainer" role as too narrow; why should he not be able to
patch a different library as long as the ticket has been discussed and
the solution approved by the official maintainers?
-Thorsten
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk