Subject: Re: [boost] Flow-based programming library for Boost?
From: Marcus Tomlinson (themarcustomlinson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-05 12:11:10
I'll get cracking on some more detailed documentation on the DSPatch website ASAP. Thanks for the heads up.
Sent from my iPad
On 05 Dec 2012, at 5:13 PM, Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Marcus Tomlinson <
> themarcustomlinson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Hmmm, interesting. Yes my library is similar but A LOT simpler (and more
>> intuitive) to use / get into, I think. Please have a look into how my
>> library works and let me know if you agree.
> If you could provide some code example in your documentations (like
> dataflow doc does) it would be easier (at least for me) to build an opinion
> on the differences between the two libraries.
> By the way, it seems that dataflow have been reviewed already and was
> rejected (both for lack of reviews and apparently confusion:
> http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/09/142198.php )
> It would be good to analyze this before submitting your library, to avoid
> This library makes me think a lot about the intel Threading Building Blocks
> "Flow" framework that seems to work the same for a specific concept. It
> could have been implemented with this kind of library.
> Personally I find these library interesting but I 'm not sure there is a
> need in my current projects.
> Joel Lamotte
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk