Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Git] Documentation for Git and Modular Boost conversion
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-11 12:07:23


> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Beman
> Dawes
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:50 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Git] Documentation for Git and Modular Boost conversion
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > * Layout of directory structure seems a significantly different
> > structure to most Boost libraries, with boost_1-0-99/boost and
> > boost_1-0-99/libs (as referenced
> http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Directory_structure. Is this intended?

You haven't confirmed that the directory structure has changed significantly.

Was
  boost-root/boost/simple/
     simple.hpp ... /detail/stuff.hpp

  boost-root/libs/simple/ test
  boost-root/libs/simple/example
  boost-root/libs/simple/doc

now is boost-root/libs/simple/include/simple.hpp ...

 and

  boost-root/libs/simple/test,
  boost-root/libs/simple/example
  boost-root/libs/simple/doc ...

There was a logic (about whose details I am having a senior moment) for the previous structure.

I just want to be sure that the change is intended (and perhaps even understand why ;-)

Would it be useful if I actually created a simple example - trying to follow your docs?

Thanks

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow,
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB  UK
+44 1539 561830  07714330204
pbristow_at_[hidden]

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk