Subject: Re: [boost] Another set of macros to deprecate (and then remove)?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-18 13:55:31
On 17/12/2012 05:08, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Thanks. This proves that the choice is deliberate.
> However, it doesn't answer whether using the double-negative is a good idea.
> Why not use BOOST_STDC_NAMESPACE and BOOST_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES instea
NO macros are for defects
HAS macros are for features
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk