Subject: Re: [boost] Another set of macros to deprecate (and then remove)?
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-18 14:23:51
>> Thanks. This proves that the choice is deliberate.
>> However, it doesn't answer whether using the double-negative is a good
>> Why not use BOOST_STDC_NAMESPACE and BOOST_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES instea
> NO macros are for defects
> HAS macros are for features
Correct, that was the original intention. Double negative or not, it makes
it quite explicit what the workaround is for.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk