Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic] ARM needs more eyes too
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-22 09:55:49
On Saturday 22 December 2012 14:44:40 Phil Endecott wrote:
> Also, how do people feel about using Boost.Atomic underneath
> shared_ptr? (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5625 - again,
> I've been using this for a long time and it seems to work.) Maybe as a
> non-default initially if we're nervous. It might help to find any bugs
> in Boost.Atomic...
In general I welcome this suggestion. However, shared_ptr probably should not
require linking to Boost.Atomic, so some header-only mode should be provided
by Boost.Atomic first.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk