Subject: Re: [boost] [git] What about unmaintained libraries?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-25 07:52:52
On 24/12/12 21:22, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> But while reading the wiki you wrote I got the impression that each
> library has its own repo linked to the boost-lib structure. This seemed
> logical, considering the case when a library is first developed as an
> independent GitHub project and then linked to boost-lib when reviewed
> and accepted. If so, each library repo is independent from boost-lib and
> thus boost-lib permissions no longer apply. Did I get it wrong?
Each library has indeed its own repository within the boost-lib
As an organization, boost-lib can have shared permissions over all the
repositories it hosts.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk