Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in serialization library
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-28 02:38:56
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:39 AM, iwg molw5 <iwg.molw5_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Non-intrusive serialization is supported in a manner similar to that used
> by Boost.Serialization.
Could you elaborate? A short example would certainly help.
> The performance of the library is difficult to comment on. The
> serializable library does not introduce any intrinsic overhead over an
> equivalent set of operations performed on a raw C structure - does that
> answer your question?
Does the library control the validity of the serialized data when
deserializing? Is there an associated overhead?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk