Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] error with nullptr_t
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-02 06:50:06
On 1 January 2013 22:49, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> On 19 December 2012 04:47, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > Regardless, (speaking as a release manager) I'd like to see this
>> > addressed one way or the other since it's a breaking change.
>> What's the way forward?
> Assuming that we want to support this configuration, the options I see are
I was asking more about how (or perhaps, who) to get started on a
> - Config defining std::nullptr_t as it does with size_t;
> - Config defining BOOST_NO_NULLPTR_T, so that libraries can activate
> workarounds, or
If you want to add something to config, it might be a good idea to
write that in a post with [config] in the subject line, or to open a
ticket. Although I prefer Eric's boost::nullptr_t, adding things to
'std' is a bad idea, precedents notwithstanding.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk