Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic] [release] possible linking problem with atomic
From: Domagoj Saric (domagoj.saric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-11 11:35:54
On 10.1.2013. 20:02, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Well, it's not a header-only library.
That's a bit 'sad' given that 'most' platforms/compilers support builtin atomic
Is there anyway (e.g. define a configuration macro) to make the library work as
header-only on those platforms (e.g. x86 and ARM)?
Can the library be changed in the future so that it includes "spin-lock
pools&co" and thus requires linking only when building for unsupported
platforms/platforms without atomic operations?
-- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk