Subject: Re: [boost] Query of Interest in annotated tree extensions to Boost.Intrusive
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-18 12:17:05
Jeff Snyder wrote:
> I've been working on some extensions to allow users to add annotations
> to tree data structures (explanation of the idea here:
There are been several recent proposals of this sort. I last posted here:
That has links to the other proposals on this list.
> 1. Is there interest in having such functionality in boost?
Yes, but we need to get it right. In my opinion, we need something
that's sufficiently generic to cover the about-3 use cases.
I'm unclear why this should be added to Boost.Intrusive, rather than
being a top-level library in its own right.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk