Subject: Re: [boost] [release] some Boost.Build fixes
From: Jürgen Hunold (jhunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-30 10:21:13
Hi Eric and Daniel
On Wednesday, 30. January 2013 10:49:47 Daniel James wrote:
> On 29 January 2013 21:33, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I would be extremely reluctant to take fixes to Boost.Build at this
> > point since the potential for havoc is so high. I'd like to understand
> > how serious the bug is and what it is blocking. I'd also like to hear
> > what the other release managers think.
> I can't connect to the boost server at the moment, so I haven't looked
> at the changes, or what the issue is. But if it the qt5 fix only
> involves code that isn't usually loaded, then it might not be that
> problematic. Depends on what the change actually is though.
The bug is here:
I just forgot one of the new qt5 modules.
> I don't think it's worth fixing a test case.
Agreed. I can
merge later. It seems we don't have a regression tester with qt4/5 configured
-- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! * voice: ++49 4257 300 ! Fährstraße 1 * fax : ++49 4257 300 ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen * jhunold_at_gmx.eu ! Germany
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk