Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [container] boost::container::vector, hybrid_vector, and performance
From: Andrew Hundt (athundt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-12 10:15:48

The OS X + clang version was on 1.52, Adam will need to chime in for the

Andrew Hundt

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> El 11/02/2013 18:12, Andrew Hundt escribió:
> The short results summary:
>> varray was generally at or near the top for performance due to its
>> simplicity,
>> and interestingly on almost all platforms std::vector significantly
>> outperformed boost::container::vector, which edged out
>> boost::container::vector<T, stack_allocator>.
> Thanks for the report. Which boost version have you used? I remember
> adding some optimizations in Boost 1.53's container::vector. Anyway I'm
> interested in improving boost::container performance, since I haven't done
> any serious effort on that direction. Until know portability between C++03
> and C++0x was the main goal.
> Best,
> Ion
> ______________________________**_________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:**
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<>

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at