Subject: Re: [boost] [gil::io] Feedback for scanline_read_iterator
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-18 20:03:33
> So...doing 2 operator++'s in a row isn't logically equivalent?
Right now, operator++ only sets the _read_scanline flag. So, doing 2
operator++ wont do anything different.
Do have something in mind?
Here is a link to the current version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk