Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gil::io] Feedback for scanline_read_iterator
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-18 20:04:56

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Christian Henning <chhenning_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> So...doing 2 operator++'s in a row isn't logically equivalent?
> Right now, operator++ only sets the _read_scanline flag. So, doing 2
> operator++ wont do anything different.
> Do have something in mind?
> Here is a link to the current version.

Here is a link to my test code

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at