Subject: Re: [boost] Git Conversion Schedule
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-02 04:05:39
On 28 February 2013 17:49, Daniel Pfeifer <daniel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We had planned NOT to modularize the history, when we made that schedule.
> This plan was rejected by the Boost community for the better. Currently we
> make a new plan. Once we have a better plan, we will make a new schedule.
Do you think we should use subversion for this release?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk