Subject: Re: [boost] [sandbox] [tree_node] Major update
From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-05 02:52:54
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Martin Knoblauch Revuelta wrote:
> Maybe you are also interested in earlier proposals. I provided some
> links and commented some ideas in the thread "[boost] Review managers
> wanted for augmented data structures" started by Vadim Stadnik several
> days ago (Feb 27, 2013).
The "Hierarchical Data Structures" proposal is one of the major directions I intend to point my library. The other proposals seem similar in functionality to a binode_container<>, one whose NodeTypeGenerator derives from binary_node_base_gen<> and either is a with_count_gen<> or derives from with_count_base_gen<>. However, at some point I'll write an AllocatorSelector that selects the Countertree suballocator as-is so that I can test its performance.
Cromwell D. Enage
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk