Re: [boost] [gil] Ok to merge new gil's extension to release branch?

Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] Ok to merge new gil's extension to release branch?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-01 17:40:43

AMDG

On 03/31/2013 04:38 PM, Christian Henning wrote:
>>> Just to be on the same page. Should the gil::io test jam file initiate
>>> the compilation of the 3rd party libs? I think this would be
>>> preferable so that the user can easily configure the correct target
>>> architecture. Instead of having to first compile all binaries target
>>> architectures before doing the gil::io tests.
>>>
>>> Is that what you are planning to do?
>>>
>>
>> /zlib//zlib will either find an existing library
>> or build zlib from source depending on how it's
>> configured.  It's basically a generic version of
>> the way Boost.Iostreams handles it.
>>
> Great! Thanks for the quick answer.
> 

I've committed this to the trunk and updated
Boost.IOStreams to use it.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe