Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] Ok to merge new gil's extension to release branch?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-01 17:40:43
On 03/31/2013 04:38 PM, Christian Henning wrote:
>>> Just to be on the same page. Should the gil::io test jam file initiate
>>> the compilation of the 3rd party libs? I think this would be
>>> preferable so that the user can easily configure the correct target
>>> architecture. Instead of having to first compile all binaries target
>>> architectures before doing the gil::io tests.
>>> Is that what you are planning to do?
>> /zlib//zlib will either find an existing library
>> or build zlib from source depending on how it's
>> configured. It's basically a generic version of
>> the way Boost.Iostreams handles it.
> Great! Thanks for the quick answer.
I've committed this to the trunk and updated
Boost.IOStreams to use it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk