Re: [boost] [signals2] Uncombined signal

Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2] Uncombined signal
From: Frank Mori Hess (fmh6jj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-18 23:59:38

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Could you define a bunch of different combiner classes all with a
> common base class, then alternate between them with
> signal.set_combiner()?
>

Err, actually I don't think that would work given the way signals2
copies the combiner.  set_combiner would need to take the combiner as
a template type.

--
Frank