Re: [boost] [signals2] Uncombined signal

Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2] Uncombined signal
From: Frank Mori Hess (fmh6jj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-18 23:49:36

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Ivan Le Lann <ivan.lelann_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 18 avr. 2013 à 17:24, Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj_at_[hidden]> a écrit :

>> I'm not really grasping your use case/motivation for this.  Could you
>> just use a combiner that returns a vector of all the individual return
>> values?
>>
>
> I did that. Main problem it that it is not lazy.
> Not all algorithms dereference all iterators.

Could you define a bunch of different combiner classes all with a
common base class, then alternate between them with
signal.set_combiner()?

--
Frank