Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc 2013] chrono::date
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-19 18:18:06
Le 19/04/13 21:37, Anurag Kalia a écrit :
> I saw the chrono::date library proposal in the ideas page of gsoc 2013. It already seems quite solid and fleshed out; I am confident that I have understood it and can carry it out. Here it is for reference: <http://tinyurl.com/ct4tc3m>
> I have a few questions though.
> 1) Is this proposal in its final stages? The Boost chrono library docs mention in appendices that they intend to implement it in later releases. What I want to ask is if I am allowed to propose changes in the library if I want to. For example, the proposal proposes that adding a year to 'Feb 29' (leap year) should result in 'Feb 28 of next year' (non-leap year). I tend to think this is counter-intuitive. The author already gives the excellent idea of using a syntax like "last/february/2013" which also covers the case of anniversaries falling on 'Feb 29' pretty well. Moreover, it is a pretty big assumption that a person would want to celebrate the 'Feb 29' anniversaries on 'Feb 28' and not on 'Mar 1'. Moreover, adding a month to '31 January' results in an invalid date (31 February). Why shouldn't we mirror the behaviour for years? We can just make a library function to cover this issue.
> In short, am I allowed to propose such changes?
It is your proposal, so you can suggest whatever you want and discuss it
on this ML; the mentor will be there to guide you. Getting feedback from
the boost community is the best way to get a good library. Thisng that
evident for us are less evident for others.
> 2) How should I apply for gsoc now that I have found my area of interest?
Follow the instructions given already on a lot of GSoC posts in this ML.
> What is the last date of application?
> Shall I post a draft of my application here first for review before submitting it officially? Am I allowed to?
Yes of course. Post here your proposal as soon as possible.
> 3) I have my final examinations scheduled during three weeks in the coming month of May after which I am totally free to pursue gsoc internship. Though I will use this time to research for design and implementations of other similar libraries, I would still need to channel much time into my examinations. How am I supposed to circumvent this conflict, given that I do have ample time to dedicate to my internship later on?
You must be free for the GSoC period.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk