Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] countdown_latch
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-21 07:18:32
On 4/21/2013 5:45 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 21/04/13 10:27, Michael Marcin a écrit :
>> I recently ran across the need to spawn a thread and wait for it to
>> finish its setup before continuing.
>> The accepted answer seems to be using a mutex and condition variable
>> to achieve this.
>> However that work clutters up the code quite a bit with the
>> implementation details.
>> I came across Java's CountDownLatch which does basically the same work
>> but bundles it up into a tidy package.
> What about using boost::barrier ?
Ah didn't know that existed. Looks like it serves a similar purpose.
Still there are a few differences.
Looks like barrier is a bit fatter to let it handle restarting on a new
Usage requires you to know the number of people that are going to call
wait at construction time as well.
IF you replaced the countdown_latch with barrier in my example you
introduce more synchronization than is necessary.
In addition to the constructor waiting on thread_func now thread_func
must wait for the constructor.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk