Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Boost.Expected
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-24 12:47:24
Le 24/04/13 18:02, Gottlob Frege a écrit :
> One thing I missed in this conversation:
> Are we considering the Alexandrescu behaviour of throwing in the destructor
> if the expected<> has not been read?
Why would you want to that?
> I was imagining just an excepted<likely_type, error_type> class. I forgot
> about the novel throwing behaviour.
This will correspond to expected_or_error.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk