Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Boost.Expected

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Boost.Expected
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-24 13:49:34

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Le 24/04/13 18:02, Gottlob Frege a écrit :
>
>  One thing I missed in this conversation:
>>
>> Are we considering the Alexandrescu behaviour of throwing in the
>> destructor
>> if the expected<> has not been read?
>>
> Why would you want to that?

I didn't say I did, but some might.  And the Alexandrescu version (which
was referenced as one design) works that way.

>
>
>> I was imagining just an excepted<likely_type, error_type> class.  I forgot
>> about the novel throwing behaviour.
>>
>
> This will correspond to expected_or_error.
>
>
I'm hoping for just one class, not multiple.

> Best,
> Vicente
>
>
>

Tony