Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.FixedPoint] Choose notation
From: Dmitriy Gorbel (dmitriycpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-29 11:51:04
Michael Marcin-3 wrote
> I dislike the names. I don't really understand what the first 2 types
> have to do with fixed-point math, other than maybe as an implementation
> detail or degenerate fixed-point type (0 fractional bits).
I add cardinal and integral types to the proposal because
this types required by C++1y proposal. I agree, this types
quite illogical. Maybe, this types proposed for supporting big integers,
but I think for big integers better use Boost.Multiprecision library.
It's easy to implement integral types based on fractional,
using template aliases, for example:
template<size_t Range> using cardinal = nonnegative<Range, 0>;
template<size_t Range> using integral = negatable<Range, 0>;
What community think about this?
Should library support integral fixed point types?
Neal Becker wrote
> Thank you. The last time we discussed this topic, the issue was not one
> notation, but of different semantics that were desired by different end
> users of
> a fixedpoint type.
> I think there were several areas of disagreement - but perhaps primary was
> whether arithmetic operations would produce different types or the same
> and how to handle arithmetic between mixed types. For example, does
> multiplication of 2 8-bit quantities promote to 16 bits or not.
> My preference is/was that no implicit conversion was ever performed and
> that it
> always had to be explicit. This is partly because the primary consumer
> for this
> technology (I think) is those working on FPGA or ASIC hardware - and they
> always be aware of any such conversions.
Best way - conversion policy,
when user can choose between implicitly/explicitly conversion.
I will try to implement both variants.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-FixedPoint-Choose-notation-tp4646262p4646298.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk