Subject: Re: [boost] [reference_wrapper] Overloading operator() in reference_wrapper
From: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-02 12:35:11
On 2013/05/03 00:10 +0900, Nathan Crookston wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Kazutoshi Satoda wrote:
>>> The standard version has 4 member typedef which are conditionally
>>> defined: result_type, argument_type, first_argument_type,
>>> second_argument_type. ...
>> Interesting. I've always considered these typedefs redundant, but this is
>> the first time I see them as actively harmful.
> Yes, this is good to know. I wondered why the standard bothered to specify
> that in our new, decltype-enabled world. ...
I can guess only one reason that the resulting functors are expected to
work with some C++03-style function adapters in some old libraries which
may have no plan to adapt C++11 features like decltype.
About the requirement of these typedefs in 20.8 [function.objects] p5
to enable standard adapters, I found that there is an open issue
LWG #2149 which is proposing to drop it.
> While not opposed to striking this paragraph, we will need the
> additional wording to fix the openning hole before this issue can move
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk