Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Boost.Expected
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-02 14:40:35
>> I suspect both optional<bool> and expected<bool> will be somewhat common
>> uses (considering the number of tri-bool classes in existence), so I think
>> this is a real problem that we need to resolve. (And I expect to write up
>> something after BoostCon/C++Now)
>> Agreed. I could try the std-proposal forum or c++std-lib-ext_at_accu.orgif you don't mind.
> You of course could, but I think std-proposal and the committee has
> probably had enough of optional for a while. I think the next best step is
> a paper clearly showing all the issues and offering clear
So I advised against bringing it up... and then I brought it up on
std-proposal myself. (Well, the existing conversation just went in that
Oh well. Some day I'll learn to listen to my own advice.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk