Re: [boost] [gsoc 2013] draft proposal for chrono::date

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc 2013] draft proposal for chrono::date
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-04 14:50:45

On May 4, 2013, at 12:16 PM, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Le 04/05/13 17:57, Anurag Kalia a écrit :
>>> 
>> I have a question here. Why are we not throwing the exception from set_if_valid_date() itself? Why did we include noexcept in its definition?
>> 
> set_if_valid_date allows the user make changes without using exceptions. This is useful on some contexts.

You could add a no_throw_t overload, or an error_code overload.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)