Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Is it lock free ?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-09 10:19:57
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Julien Nitard <julien.nitard_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> My interpretation of a log library should be multiple producer single
> consumer, is there such a lockfree library (not patented) that boost could
> use ?
Boost.Log has an internal thread safe queue. It is not lock-free but it is
There is Boost.LockFree library, although its data structures impose
certain requirements on the stored types that are not suitable for
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk