Re: [boost] [log] Is it lock free ?

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Is it lock free ?
From: Julien Nitard (julien.nitard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-09 10:00:18

>
> But I would more need a queue like LockFree. and it would obviously be
> asynchronous,
>

My interpretation of a log library should be multiple producer single
consumer, is there such a lockfree library (not patented) that boost could
use ?

Thanks,

Julien