Re: [boost] SIMD implementation of uBLAS

Subject: Re: [boost] SIMD implementation of uBLAS
From: Aditya Avinash (adityaavinash143_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-29 09:58:43

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Nasos Iliopoulos <nasos_i_at_[hidden]>wrote:

>
> If I ever had to choose I would  go with boost.SIMD, because the folks at
> Metascale have put some really hard work shaping their library and  a
> custom solution would only be ugly plagiarism.
>
> Also in that case consider that you outsource one of your major problems:
> supporting new vector instructions. You only work on them if nobody
> supports boost.SIMD anymore.
>

Thank you!

This question is for the list. What about ARM NEON?

-- 
Aditya Avinash Atluri