Subject: Re: [boost] [range] [extensions] Default values for range access adaptors?
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-09 08:28:49
Yusuke Ichinohe wrote:
> I think simpler solution would be to add range support for
> boost::optional in additional header (e.g.
> i.e. boost::optional will become random access range.
I saw this "container-view of boost::optional" on the Boost ML in the past,
but I don't remember what was the conclusion.
If you want to make this support added in Boost.Range,
I recommend you to start a new thread (with the magic words
"Oven range library already has this functionality").
And please don't top-post!
( http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html )
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk