Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a library for actor programming?
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-12 05:03:38
On 06/11/2013 11:31 PM, james wrote:
> I have found systems with soft data structures to be more easily
> enhanced than ones built from IDL, and have not had many problems from
> mismatched syntaxes. Rigid syntax (whether from IDL, or some XML form
> check) always seem to end up subverted with additional key/value data or
> (even worse) data embedded into 'structured comments'. There's a reason
> for that and it all goes back to schema evolution, and that's why
> systems like protobuf tend to sacrifice clean syntax for extensibility..
JSON (combined with REST) is probably a better example, because
protobuf is also built from an IDL (the .proto file) and knowledge
of the IDL is needed in order to correctly interpret some fields.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk