Re: [boost] [c++11]

Subject: Re: [boost] [c++11]
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-18 15:26:15

On 2013-06-18 21:13, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Am 18.06.2013 21:09 schrieb "Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely.boost_at_[hidden]>:
>> >
>> > On 18 June 2013 19:46, Thomas Heller wrote:
>>> > > I will support you in your efforts for going for a C++11
>>> > > based solution under the condition that boost will move on and deprecate
>>> > > all libraries that will be unusable with a C++03 compiler. 
>> >
>> > Huh?  You're suggesting deprecating C++11-only libraries before
>> > they're even added?
> The other way around. Move on with C++11 and get rid of the C++03 cruft.
>
Ah, that makes more sense. Working on a C++11 library myself, I was
trying to wrap my head around it and failed :-)

The really interesting question is though: How about the next few years,
when C++14 and C++17 enter the stage? For instance, I'd really love to
use static_if as soon as it is available :-)