Re: [boost] [c++11]

Subject: Re: [boost] [c++11]
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-18 15:26:28

On 18 June 2013 20:13, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Am 18.06.2013 21:09 schrieb "Jonathan Wakely":
>>
>> On 18 June 2013 19:46, Thomas Heller wrote:
>> > I will support you in your efforts for going for a C++11
>> > based solution under the condition that boost will move on and deprecate
>> > all libraries that will be unusable with a C++03 compiler. Maybe
> Boost.AFIO
>> > should be the library that advocates and pushes this breaking change.
>>
>> Huh?  You're suggesting deprecating C++11-only libraries before
>> they're even added?
>
> The other way around. Move on with C++11 and get rid of the C++03 cruft.

I'm still confused, now you're advocating making all libraries C++11-only?

What libraries get deprecated?

Do you mean deprecate C++03 *compilers*?