|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-26 13:47:49
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Let me give that do notation I mentioned in the earlier email a better
> definition:
>
> do( stmt1, stmt2, stmt3 ).
>
>
I don't think C++ guarantees the order of those statements. Is that a
problem?
Tony
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk