Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-26 14:40:34
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Let me give that do notation I mentioned in the earlier email a better
> > definition:
> > do( stmt1, stmt2, stmt3 ).
> I don't think C++ guarantees the order of those statements. Is that a
No. The actual evaluation of those expressions (which can be though of as
'lazy'), if they are evaluated a all, will occur in the body of the do
function in the correct order. C++ expressions, of course, will be
evaluated before the do function is entered, but this shouldn't cause any
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk