Subject: Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-29 04:11:32
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Mathias Gaunard
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 9:28 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?
> On 28/06/13 17:07, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > To get into Boost (in fact to get much further) it needs some tests (using Boost.test of course)
> Using Boost.Test is not a requirement AFAIK.
No - but it is very popular and well understood, and simple to use for simple cases, and works well
with the suite of testers on the many platforms. I can't think of any reason why not to use it.
Perhaps a few simple loopback tests are all the is really essential?
(I note, with approval, that lots of potential 'naughty' abuses are already caught by assert
compile-time checks in the code).
And some examples already exist, but a one or two really simple ones would be desirable too. The
latter could be referenced from the Quickbook text as snippets of code.
PS I will reply privately about prototype docs.
--- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]