Subject: Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-29 13:32:23
On 29/06/13 10:11, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> Using Boost.Test is not a requirement AFAIK.
> No - but it is very popular and well understood, and simple to use for simple cases, and works well
> with the suite of testers on the many platforms. I can't think of any reason why not to use it.
Two main reasons:
- you already have a test suite built with another tool. In which case,
all that's needed is that the output can be collected by the regression
- you want something more powerful than Boost.Test or more specialized
to testing your problem domain
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk