Subject: Re: [boost] [boost/spirit] numeric policy
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-07 19:06:47
> On 07/08/2013 04:23 p.m., Brian Schrom wrote:
> > On 08/07/2013 11:28 AM, Richard wrote:
> >> Brian, whatever you're using to nicely right-justify your messages as
> >> above is reformatting your patch which makes it rather useless:
> > Thank you for letting me know. Patch attached.
> > If you feel that this approach is appropriate, I can do some
> > small additional changes to conform to the code base properly if I
> > know what they are. If there is substantial effort to get where it
> > needs to be, it is probably not worth your time right now and the
> > patch can be archived in the mailing list if it's useful for a later
> I'm thinking there should be a parse_fail customization point as well, or
> otherwise a way to react when parsing fails. It would help to know what
> your specific use case for this extensions is.
FWIW, there is already a customization point used by rules and attr_cast,
not sure if it's usable in this case, though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk