Subject: Re: [boost] [boost/spirit] numeric policy
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-07 17:52:29
On 07/08/2013 04:23 p.m., Brian Schrom wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 11:28 AM, Richard wrote:
>> Brian, whatever you're using to nicely right-justify your messages as
>> above is reformatting your patch which makes it rather useless:
> Thank you for letting me know. Patch attached.
> If you feel that this approach is appropriate, I can do some small
> additional changes to conform to the code base properly if I know what
> they are. If there is substantial effort to get where it needs to be,
> it is probably not worth your time right now and the patch can be
> archived in the mailing list if it's useful for a later time.
I'm thinking there should be a parse_fail customization point as well,
or otherwise a way to react when parsing fails. It would help to know
what your specific use case for this extensions is.
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk